Terry Reedy wrote: > If 3.0 comes with a conversion program, then I would like to see 'lambda' > replaced with either 'def' or another abbreviation like 'edef' (expression > def) or 'func'. making the implied return statment visible might also be a good idea, e.g. lambda x, y: return x + y or even def (x, y): return x + y </F>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4