RetroSearch Browse

Sat Feb 4 18:26:12 CET 2006 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-February/060394.html

BJörn Lindqvist <bjourne at gmail.com> wrote in
news:740c3aec0602040816w34981344n271b237d6b6c9fd5 at mail.gmail.com: 

> On 2/4/06, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote:
>> I won't even look at the PEP as long as it uses / or // (or any other
>> operator) for concatenation.
> 
> That's good, because it doesn't. :)
> http://www.python.org/peps/pep-0355.html 
> 
No, but it does say that / may be reintroduced 'if the BFDL so desires'. I 
hope that doesn't mean the BDFL may be overruled. :^)

I'm not convinced by the rationale given why atime,ctime,mtime and size are 
methods rather than properties but I do find this PEP much more agreeable 
than the last time I looked at it.

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-February/060394.html below:

[Python-Dev] Path PEP and the division operator