A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-February/060329.html below:

[Python-Dev] syntactic support for sets

[Python-Dev] syntactic support for sets [Python-Dev] syntactic support for setsGreg Wilson gvwilson at cs.utoronto.ca
Wed Feb 1 22:44:32 CET 2006
> Generator expressions make syntactic support irrelevant:

Not when you're teaching the language to undergraduates: I haven't
actually done the study yet (though I may this summer), but I'm willing to
bet that allowing "math" notation for sets will more than double their
use.  (Imagine having to write "list(1, 2, 3, 4, 5)"...)

> Accordingly,Guido rejected the braced notation for set comprehensions.
> See:  http://www.python.org/peps/pep-0218.html

"...however, the issue could be revisited for Python 3000 (see PEP 3000)."
So I'm only 1994 years early ;-)

Thanks,
Greg
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4