Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-February/060328.html below:

[Python-Dev] Octal literals

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] syntactic support for sets
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Octal literals
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 01:35:14PM -0500, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> The proposal for something like 0xff, 0o664, and 0b1001001 seems like
> the right direction, although 'o' for octal literal looks kind of funky.
> Maybe 'c' for oCtal?  (remember it's 'x' for heXadecimal).
>
> -Barry
>

+1

I definately agree with the 0c664 octal literal. Seems rather more
intuitive.

Matt

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] syntactic support for sets
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Octal literals
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4