RetroSearch Browse

Wed Feb 1 23:59:21 CET 2006 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-February/060323.html

Thomas Wouters <thomas at xs4all.net> writes:

> On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 11:29:16AM -0500, Tim Peters wrote:
>> [Thomas Wouters]
>> > Well, I said 4.0.3, and that was wrong. It's actually a pre-release of 4.0.3
>> > (in Debian's 'unstable' distribution.) However, 4.0.2 (the actual release)
>> > behaves the same way. The normal make process shows quite a lot of output on
>> > systems that use gcc, so I wouldn't be surprised if people did ignore it,
>> > for the most part.
>
>> Does it really?  It's completely warning-free on Windows, and that's
>> the intent, and it takes ongoing work to keep it that way.  Over at,
>> e.g.,
>
> No, it's mostly warning-free, it just outputs a lot of text. By default,
> the warnings don't stand out much. And if you have a decent computer, it
> scrolls by pretty fast, too. ;)

"make -s" is a wonderful thing :)

Cheers,
mwh

-- 
  In case you're not a computer person, I should probably point out
  that "Real Soon Now" is a technical term meaning "sometime before
  the heat-death of the universe, maybe".
                                     -- Scott Fahlman <sef at cs.cmu.edu>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-February/060323.html below:

[Python-Dev] Compiler warnings