[Thomas Wouters]
> Well, I said 4.0.3, and that was wrong. It's actually a pre-release of 4.0.3
> (in Debian's 'unstable' distribution.) However, 4.0.2 (the actual release)
> behaves the same way. The normal make process shows quite a lot of output on
> systems that use gcc, so I wouldn't be surprised if people did ignore it,
> for the most part.
Does it really? It's completely warning-free on Windows, and that's
the intent, and it takes ongoing work to keep it that way. Over at,
e.g.,
http://www.python.org/dev/buildbot/g5%20osx.3%20trunk/builds/46/step-compile/0
I only see one gcc warning, coming from Python/Python-ast.c. I
suppose that isn't a complete build, though.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4