RetroSearch Browse

Fri Dec 8 17:37:44 CET 2006 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-December/070296.html

On 8 Dec 2006, at 16:38, Josiah Carlson wrote:

> My statement in the email you replied to above was to say that if we
> wanted it to return a group, then we could include subsequent .group 
> (0)
> with the same semantics as the original match object.

And my reply was simply to point out that that's not workable.

> At this point it doesn't matter, Frederik will produce what he  
> wants to
> produce, and I'm sure most of us will be happy with the outcome.   
> Those
> that are unhappy will need to write their own patch or deal with being
> unhappy.

I believe I've already conceded that twice.

Kind regards,

Alastair.

--
http://alastairs-place.net

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-December/070296.html below:

[Python-Dev] [NPERS] Re: a feature i'd like to see in python #2: indexing of match objects