Martin v. Löwis schrieb: > #1610575 suggests to introduce the 't' code to support the _Bool > type where available, and uses char if it isn't available. > > Any objections to adding it? Not from me, although the patch should probably be extended to add a ctypes.c99_bool (or how it would be named) type - see also the comments that I posted to the tracker. Thomas
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4