Martin v. Löwis wrote: >> it can quickly become rather confusing if you also interpret m[:] as >> m.groups(), not to mention if you add len() and arbitrary slicing to >> the mix. what about m[] and m[i,j,k], btw? > > I take it that you are objecting to that feature, then? I haven't seen a complete and self-consistent proposal yet, so that's not easy to say. </F>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4