Martin v. Löwis wrote: >> I know what the Zen says about special cases, but in this case the rules >> were apparently broken with impunity. > > Well, the proposal was to interpret m[i] as m.group(i), for all values > of i. I can't see anything confusing with that. it can quickly become rather confusing if you also interpret m[:] as m.groups(), not to mention if you add len() and arbitrary slicing to the mix. what about m[] and m[i,j,k], btw? </F>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4