Aahz schrieb: >>> this one is fairly simple. if `m' is a match object, i'd like to be >>> able to write m[1] instead of m.group(1). (similarly, m[:] should return >>> the same as list(m.groups()).) this would remove some of the verbosity >>> of regexp code, with probably a net gain in readability; certainly no loss. >> Please post a patch to sf.net/projects/python (or its successor). > > Given the list of issues and subsequent discussion so far, I think a PEP > will be required. This needs more documentation than the typical patch. I disagree. So far, nobody has spoken against the proposed feature. It's really a small addition of a new method to an existing type. Entire classes have been added to the standard library without a PEP. People can still criticize the patch when its posted (and it's not clear that the OP is even willing to produce a patch). Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4