Martin v. Löwis wrote: > Ah, right; I misread his proposal as saying that m[:] should return > [m[0]] + list(m.groups()) (rather, I expected that m.groups() would > include m.group(0)). match groups are numbered 1..N, not 0..(N-1), in both the API and in the RE syntax (and we don't have much control over the latter). > To answer your first question: it is clearly groups that you want > to index, just as the .group() method indexes groups. so what should len(m) do? </F>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4