Nick Coghlan wrote: > reversed(seq[start:stop:step]) becomes seq[(stop-1)%abs(step):start-1:-step] > > An rslice builtin would make the latter version significantly easier to read: > > seq[rslice(start, stop, step)] How would this deal with omitted start and/or stop values? -- Greg
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4