A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-August/068501.html below:

[Python-Dev] draft of patch guidelines

[Python-Dev] draft of patch guidelines [Python-Dev] draft of patch guidelinesChad Whitacre chad at zetaweb.com
Mon Aug 28 04:10:34 CEST 2006
Brett,

>> I think this is less accurate. Patches languish because of limited time
>> *and* because newbies don't have any social capital w/in the Python
>> community. New patch contributors are volunteers too, so they understand
>> that constraint. Their big problem is their outsider status, to which
>> the patch angels/5-for-1 system is an elegant solution. And that's what
>> should be emphasized in this FAQ.
> 
> But that makes us sound elitist.

To be honest I took away the opposite lesson. New patch contributors 
acutely feel their outsider status; this is to be expected in any social 
system. The fact that there is a clear, established path for newcomers 
to follow -- the 5-for-1 rule -- is precisely what makes the Python 
community non-elitist in this instance. Transparent documentation on 
this point would further erode any elitism.



chad
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4