A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-August/068494.html below:

[Python-Dev] draft of patch guidelines

[Python-Dev] draft of patch guidelines [Python-Dev] draft of patch guidelinesChad Whitacre chad at zetaweb.com
Sun Aug 27 20:41:21 CEST 2006
Brett,

 > When you submit your patch, the tracker notifies a mailing list that
 > most core Python developers subscribe to of the creation of your new
 > patch.

Isn't "of the creation of your new patch" redundant? What else would it 
be notifying the list of?


 > Your patch may languish for weeks or more before anyone volunteers a
 > response because of limited time on the part of Python developers.

I think this is less accurate. Patches languish because of limited time 
*and* because newbies don't have any social capital w/in the Python 
community. New patch contributors are volunteers too, so they understand 
that constraint. Their big problem is their outsider status, to which 
the patch angels/5-for-1 system is an elegant solution. And that's what 
should be emphasized in this FAQ.

In other words, I still prefer my wording. But since I'm a newbie with 
little merit, I'll be content with whatever you decide. :)



chad
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4