Guido van Rossum wrote: > I prefer to focus on "clearer" and "less error-prone" rather than > "faster" in most cases. well, given that "startwith" is by far the most common typo I make when writing Python programs these days, I'm not so sure about that error-proneness thing, but never mind... > I do agree it's a minor embarrassment that s.startswith(t) is slower > than s[:len(t)]==t; but I think we should make startswith() faster > rather than recommending the other idiom. absolutely (see the py3k list for some related discussion). </F>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4