Guido van Rossum wrote: > (*) I found an example of code testing "if string.find(s, t) != 0", > thinking it was a bug attempting to write "if t in s", but which Vinay > identified as a 1.5.2 idiom for "if not s.startswith(t)"... and as noted on the py3k list, not a very good one, given that the usual way to write that under 1.5.2 is a lot faster (*). </F> *) even faster than "startswith", in many cases.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4