RetroSearch Browse

Thu Aug 17 13:22:53 CEST 2006 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-August/068331.html

On 8/16/06, "Martin v. Löwis" <martin at v.loewis.de> wrote:
>
> Guido van Rossum schrieb:
> > I think the test isn't hardly focused enough on int allocation. I
> > wonder if you could come up with a benchmark that repeatedly allocates
> > 100s of 1000s of ints and then deletes them?
>
> The question is: where to store them? In a pre-allocated list, or in a
> growing list?

Or you can expose Py_INCREF to Python code. I'm thinking about that for
big-mem tests anyway ;-)

-- 
Thomas Wouters <thomas at python.org>

Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me
spread!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20060817/ada243d2/attachment.htm 

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-August/068331.html below:

[Python-Dev] Benchmarking the int allocator (Was: Type of range object members)