A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-August/068301.html below:

[Python-Dev] Type of range object members

[Python-Dev] Type of range object members [Python-Dev] Type of range object membersskip at pobox.com skip at pobox.com
Wed Aug 16 16:02:27 CEST 2006
    Guido> I worry that dropping the special allocator will be too slow.

    Greg> Surely there's some compromise that would allow recently-used ints
    Greg> to be kept around, but reclaimed if memory becomes low?

    Martin> Hardly. The efficiency of the special-case allocator also comes
    Martin> from the fact that it doesn't ever have to release memory. Just
    Martin> try changing it to see what I mean.

Wouldn't use of obmalloc offset much of that?  Before obmalloc was
available, the int free list was a huge win.  Is it likely to be such a huge
win today?

Skip
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4