Fredrik Lundh wrote: > "Chris S" wrote: > >> and while most users and the w3 spec >> (http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xml-c14n-20010315#NoNSPrefixRewriting) >> agree this feature is actually a bug > > ET's not a canonicalization library, and doesn't claim to be one, so that reference isn't > very relevant. And "most users" know that ET uses a simplified infoset; it's not exactly > a secret. And if you need an XML library with ET's API that does retain namespace prefixes and has support for canonicalization and a boatload of other features, you could try lxml. http://codespeak.net/lxml Regards, Martijn
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4