A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-August/068232.html below:

[Python-Dev] Arlington VA sprint on Sept. 23

[Python-Dev] Arlington VA sprint on Sept. 23 [Python-Dev] Arlington VA sprint on Sept. 23A.M. Kuchling amk at amk.ca
Tue Aug 15 01:48:52 CEST 2006
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 12:21:34AM +0200, Georg Brandl wrote:
> * close RFEs and patches which have no chance of going in (there are many
>   patches on SF having one or two "-1" comments, is anyone ever going to
>   check them in without a python-dev discussion?)

In the past, someone (I think Raymond) has argued that we shouldn't
close old bug reports because even if no one is interested in
processing them *now*, someone might come along someday who wants to
update that module and fix those bugs or apply those enhancements.

Perhaps we need a 'not dead, not actively pursued' state for patches
and RFEs.  

--amk

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4