"Chris S" wrote: > and while most users and the w3 spec > (http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xml-c14n-20010315#NoNSPrefixRewriting) > agree this feature is actually a bug ET's not a canonicalization library, and doesn't claim to be one, so that reference isn't very relevant. And "most users" know that ET uses a simplified infoset; it's not exactly a secret. I think you need to work on your FUD skills. > at least patch the stdlib's version of Elementtree to produce an output > more in line with the w3 standard. And that patch would look exactly how ? </F>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4