Neal Becker schrieb: > 1) Should assignment to a temporary object be allowed? Unlike Michael, I think the question does make sense, and the answer is "no", for the reason Michael gave: you assign to names, not to objects. > 2) Should the syntax for creation of a temporary object be a constructor > call? Now, *that* question makes no sense. Why do you need special syntax to create a temporary object? Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4