M.-A. Lemburg wrote: > Hiding programmer errors is not making life easier in the > long run, so I'm -1 on having the equality comparison return > False. I don't see how this is greatly different from, e.g. [1, 2] == (1, 2) returning False. Comparing things of different types may or may not indicate a bug in the code as well, but we don't seem to worry that it doesn't raise an exception. -- Greg
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4