RetroSearch Browse

Tue Aug 8 18:18:10 CEST 2006 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-August/068053.html

On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 12:04:16 -0400, "Phillip J. Eby" <pje at telecommunity.com> wrote:
>
>PEP 302 doesn't need to be changed, since Python now conforms to it again. 
>That is, every object in sys.path_importer_cache is either an importer or 
>None.  It's just that there is an additional type of importer there that 
>didn't occur before.  If you have code that expects only certain types of 
>importers to be there, that code was already broken.
>

Thanks.

Jean-Paul

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-August/068053.html below:

[Python-Dev] Release manager pronouncement needed: PEP 302 Fix