Gregory P. Smith schrieb: > Sigh. Half the reason I did the hashlib work was to get much faster > optimized versions of the hash algorithms into python. I'll be > disappointed if that doesn't happen. Sad as it sounds, it appears you just did half of the work, then (omitting the Windows build process). > hashlib passes its test suite with our without openssl. If I make the > windows project file updates to simply build and include _hashlib.pyd > in the windows installer what harm is that going to cause? None, if you do it correctly (where correctly includes AMD64 and IA64 builds), add text to PCbuild/readme.txt, and edit msi.py properly. That is, assuming hashlib then still works correctly on Windows (which is hard to tell). > IMHO the > windows python 2.5 build as it is is missing a feature by not > including this. Wrong incantation :-) We are in feature freeze now, so adding a feature is a big no-no. You should have argued this is a bug <0.5 wink>. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4