David Hopwood schrieb: > Michael Foord wrote: >> David Hopwood wrote:[snip..] >> >>>>> we should, of course, continue to use the one we always used (for >>>>> "ascii", there is no difference between the two). >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> This seems the most (only ?) logical solution. >>> No; always considering Unicode and non-ASCII byte strings to be distinct >>> is just as logical. > > I think you must have misread my comment: Indeed. The misunderstanding originates from your sentence starting with "no", when, in fact, you seem to be supporting the proposal I made. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4