A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-August/068030.html below:

[Python-Dev] unicode hell/mixing str and unicode as dictionary keys

[Python-Dev] unicode hell/mixing str and unicode as dictionary keys [Python-Dev] unicode hell/mixing str and unicode as dictionary keys"Martin v. Löwis" martin at v.loewis.de
Tue Aug 8 01:27:24 CEST 2006
David Hopwood schrieb:
> Michael Foord wrote:
>> David Hopwood wrote:[snip..]
>>
>>>>> we should, of course, continue to use the one we always used (for
>>>>> "ascii", there is no difference between the two).
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> This seems the most (only ?) logical solution.
>>> No; always considering Unicode and non-ASCII byte strings to be distinct
>>> is just as logical.
> 
> I think you must have misread my comment:

Indeed. The misunderstanding originates from your sentence starting with
"no", when, in fact, you seem to be supporting the proposal I made.

Regards,
Martin
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4