RetroSearch Browse

Sun Apr 30 12:06:15 CEST 2006 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-April/064613.html

Josiah Carlson wrote:
> Specifically in the case of bytes.join(), the current common use-case of
> <literal>.join(...) would become something similar to
> bytes(<literal>).join(...), unless bytes objects got a syntax... Or
> maybe I'm missing something?

I think what you are missing is that algorithms that currently operate
on byte strings should be reformulated to operate on character strings,
not reformulated to operate on bytes objects.

Regards,
Martin

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-April/064613.html below:

[Python-Dev] methods on the bytes object