At 11:38 AM 4/27/2006 -0700, Guido van Rossum wrote: >The change below was rolled back because it broke other stuff. But IMO >it is actually necessary to fix this, Huh? The change you showed wasn't reverted AFAICT; it's still on the trunk. > otherwise those few exceptions >that don't derive from Exception won't be printed correctly by the >traceback module: It looks like the original change (not the change you listed) should've been using "issubclass(etype, BaseException)". (I only reverted the removal of 'isinstance()', which was causing string exceptions to break.) Anyway, looks like a four-letter fix (i.e. add "Base" there), unless there was some other problem I'm missing?
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4