skip at pobox.com wrote: [...] > Should be closed/rejected. [...] > > Neal> S 304 Controlling Generation of Bytecode Files Montanaro > > Probably ditto. Rejected would be a wrong description, IMO; "withdrawn" describes it better. It's not that the feature is undesirable or the specific approach at solving the problem - just nobody is interested to work on it. So future contributors shouldn't get the impression that this was discussed and rejected, but that it was discussed and abandoned. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4