RetroSearch Browse

Wed Apr 26 13:19:19 CEST 2006 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-April/064383.html

A.M. Kuchling wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 04:10:02PM -0400, Jim Jewett wrote:
>> I don't see a good way to say "It looks good to me".  I don't see any
>> way to say "There were issues, but I think they're resolved now".  So
>> either way, I and the author are both sort of waiting for a committer
>> to randomly happen back over old patches.
> 
> If there are too many patches waiting for a committer to assess them,
> that probably points up the need for more committers.

Simply adding more committers in general isn't necessarily the answer though, 
since it takes a while to feel entitled to check code in for different areas. 
I know I'm pretty reluctant to commit anything not directly related to the AST 
compiler, PEP 338 or PEP 343.

Cheers,
Nick.

-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
             http://www.boredomandlaziness.org

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-April/064383.html below:

[Python-Dev] Reviewed patches [was: SoC proposal: "fix some old, old bugs in sourceforge"]