RetroSearch Browse

Wed Apr 26 01:21:31 CEST 2006 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-April/064351.html

"Brett Cannon" <brett at python.org> wrote in message 
news:bbaeab100604251313r1987c13fwd73df678c84e7da2 at mail.gmail.com...
> So, if you could, please reply to this message with ONE thing you have
> found in a tracker other than SF that you have liked (especially
> compared to SF) and ONE thing you dislike/hate about SF's tracker.  I
> will use the replies as a quick-and-dirty features list of stuff that
> we would like to see demonstrated in the test trackers.

The most useful thing I can think of is to be able to tag each item by the 
doc section (lang ref, lib ref, tut, pep) most applicable to the item and 
then be able to sort tracker items (on any of the lists, possibly) by such 
tags or be able to extract all tracker items, or all open tracker items, 
for a particular section.

Terry Jan Reedy

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-April/064351.html below:

[Python-Dev] what do you like about other trackers and what do youhate about SF?