At 04:48 AM 4/25/2006 +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote: >Wanting to have two names for the same function tells me there's a problem >with the terminology, not that we should actually have two names for the same >function :) It is purely an implementation detail of @contextmanager that it can be used to define __context__ methods. It would be perfectly legal to implement it in such a way that there were two helper classes, one with a __context__ method, and the other with the __enter__/__exit__ methods. I'm fine, however, with: 1. Changing the decorator name to @contextfactory 2. Requiring objects with __enter/__exit__ to also have __context__ (i.e., keep "context" as a subtype of "contextmanager") The truth is that @contextmanager is a misnomer anyway, because it doesn't turn the function into a context manager, it turns the function into a context factory - i.e., when called, it returns a context (that's also a contextmanager).
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4