On 4/24/06, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote: > > I think I've now read enough on the subject that my value as an > > unbiased reader is being lost... > > Your input really helped me figure out where the problem was, though. Trying > to describe 3 different things using only 2 distinct terms was a recipe for > confusion in anybody's book :) Glad it was of some use :-) > > PS Is anyone else arguing with Nick on this? Now that I'm reduced to > > intuitive "well, I prefer it" arguments, it would be nice to hear what > > people's gut feelings are - "contexts create context managers", > > "context managers create contexts", "so confused I don't know"... :-) > > ? [...] > The changes I made this weekend are designed to give everything its own name, > leaving "context" free to refer to either the runtime context or a context > specifier or whatever else makes sense in context. OK. At this point, the discussion seems to have mutated from a "Phillip vs Nick" debate to a "Paul vs Nick" debate. I think I need to duck out now and we'll see if this version passes by general acclaim (or sheer exhaustion :-)) Paul.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4