Thomas Heller wrote: > Personally, I *like* the ctypes name. But I'm open for suggestions, > and it might have intersting consequences if the Python core package > would be renamed to something else. > > Any suggestions? Well, my only concern was py_object. I wondered whether the py_ prefix is really necessary, or, if it is meant to match PyObject* whether it should be called PyObject or PyObject_p. However, if every ctypes user knows what py_object is, there is probably little point in renaming it. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4