RetroSearch Browse

Fri Apr 21 11:25:00 CEST 2006 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-April/064083.html

I suggest to ignore this thread. The OP seems clueless and the names
are fine. Don't waste your time.

On 4/21/06, Thomas Heller <theller at python.net> wrote:
> Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> > Dennis Heuer wrote:
> >> Module names
> >> like hashlib are not python-like too (too c/lowlevel-like).
> >
> > I agree with Greg: hashlib is a Pythonic name for a module,
> > just like httplib, mhlib, xmlrpclib, cookielib, contextlib,
> > difflib, ...
> >
> > OTOH, it might be indeed that the ctypes name need to be
> > aligned with naming conventions.
> >
>
> Personally, I *like* the ctypes name.  But I'm open for suggestions,
> and it might have intersting consequences if the Python core package
> would be renamed to something else.
>
> Any suggestions?
>
> Thomas
>
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org
>

--
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-April/064083.html below:

[Python-Dev] python 2.5alpha and naming schemes