A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-April/064039.html below:

[Python-Dev] setuptools in 2.5.

[Python-Dev] setuptools in 2.5. [Python-Dev] setuptools in 2.5.Ian Bicking ianb at colorstudy.com
Thu Apr 20 23:41:53 CEST 2006
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> - they're currently discussing whether to use stricter version requirements
> for individual components, to increase the chance that people end up using
> a combination that someone else has actually tested.

I don't think setuptools version requirements are enough to ensure the 
integrity of all pieces of a complex system will work together. 
Figuring out a self-consistent set of packages to work together is 
something that is rather independent of any particular package, and 
Setuptools doesn't have a facility for that.  But it does provide the 
tools to build that kind of facility, and egg-based installations 
provide the sufficient metadata to report on what has been built.  So I 
think it is a step in the right direction.  Integrating packages from a 
wide variety of sources is hard.


-- 
Ian Bicking  /  ianb at colorstudy.com  /  http://blog.ianbicking.org
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4