RetroSearch Browse

Wed Apr 19 15:00:25 CEST 2006 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-April/063918.html

On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 10:00:21PM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> And the parenthetical comment was completely backwards and should have read:
> 
>   (This means that all context managers are contexts, but not all contexts 
>   are
>    context managers).
> 
> The reason for recommending that context managers should be contexts is 
> similar to the reason that iterators should be iterables - so that doing 
> the __context__() call manually will still give you something that can be 
> used in a with statement.

So the intention is to enable something like:

ctx = lock.__context__()
with ctx:
    ...

Which works as long as people don't try to use the context in two
nested 'with' statements.  Fair enough.  I don't think I'll suggest
doing this in the "What's New", though.  :)

--amk

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-April/063918.html below:

[Python-Dev] Why are contexts also managers? (was r45544