A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-April/063902.html below:

[Python-Dev] a flattening operator?

[Python-Dev] a flattening operator? [Python-Dev] a flattening operator?Josiah Carlson jcarlson at uci.edu
Wed Apr 19 08:52:19 CEST 2006
Greg Ewing <greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz> wrote:
> Josiah Carlson wrote:
> 
> > One major problem with this is that except for function calls, * is the
> > multiplication operator, which operates on two arguments.  *foo is an
> > operation on a single argument, and without parenthesis, would be
> > ambiguously parsed.
> 
> No, it wouldn't. There's no problem in giving an operator
> different unary and binary meanings; '-' already does
> that.

I stand corrected.  Though the look of 'print *e' bothers me.

 - Josiah

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4