Greg Ewing <greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz> wrote: > Josiah Carlson wrote: > > > One major problem with this is that except for function calls, * is the > > multiplication operator, which operates on two arguments. *foo is an > > operation on a single argument, and without parenthesis, would be > > ambiguously parsed. > > No, it wouldn't. There's no problem in giving an operator > different unary and binary meanings; '-' already does > that. I stand corrected. Though the look of 'print *e' bothers me. - Josiah
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4