RetroSearch Browse

Mon Apr 17 00:00:43 CEST 2006 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-April/063790.html

On 4/16/06, "Martin v. Löwis" <martin at v.loewis.de> wrote:
> Brett Cannon wrote:
> > Basically, from all the replies I have gotten has said that package
> > that were/are externally maintained either considers Python HEAD as
> > the current version or watches checkins and the bug tracker and thus
> > the PEP is really not needed.  So unless some package steps forward
> > and says that they prefer external reporting of bugs and patches, I
> > will consider this PEP idea dead and just modify HEAD without worrying
> > about it.
>
> Not sure whether Fredrik Lundh has responded, but I believe he once
> said that he would prefer if ElementTree isn't directly modified, but
> that instead patches are filed on the SF tracker and assigned to him.
>

Nope, Fredrik never responded.  I am cc:ing him directly to see if he
has a preference along with Gerhard to see if he has one as well for
pysqlite.

-Brett

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-April/063790.html below:

[Python-Dev] need info for externally maintained modules PEP