RetroSearch Browse

Sun Apr 16 23:10:48 CEST 2006 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-April/063789.html

Brett Cannon wrote:
> Basically, from all the replies I have gotten has said that package
> that were/are externally maintained either considers Python HEAD as
> the current version or watches checkins and the bug tracker and thus
> the PEP is really not needed.  So unless some package steps forward
> and says that they prefer external reporting of bugs and patches, I
> will consider this PEP idea dead and just modify HEAD without worrying
> about it.

Not sure whether Fredrik Lundh has responded, but I believe he once
said that he would prefer if ElementTree isn't directly modified, but
that instead patches are filed on the SF tracker and assigned to him.

Regards,
Martin

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-April/063789.html below:

[Python-Dev] need info for externally maintained modules PEP