RetroSearch Browse

Fri Apr 14 21:32:27 CEST 2006 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-April/063747.html

On Thu, 13 Apr 2006, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:

> Tim Peters wrote:
>>> I'm not the one to decide, but at some time the traceback module should be
>>> rewritten to match the interpreter behavior.
>>
>> No argument from me about that.
>
> I also think the traceback module should be corrected, and the test
> cases updated, despite the objections that it may break other people's
> doctest test cases.

Assuming this is fixed in 2.5 final, is there some way to write doctests 
that work on both 2.4 and 2.5?  If not, should something like 
doctest.IGNORE_EXCEPTION_DETAIL be added -- say IGNORE_EXCEPTION_MODULE?

John

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-April/063747.html below:

[Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] r45321 - in python/trunk: Lib/test/test_traceback.py Lib/traceback.py Misc/NEWS