Neal Norwitz wrote: > I'll leave this decision to Martin or someone else, since I'm not > familiar with the ramifications. Since it was documented as unsigned, > I think it's reasonable to consider changing. Though it could create > signed-ness warnings in other modules. I'm not sure but it's possible > it could create problems for C++ compilers since they are pickier. My concern is not so much that it becomes unsigned in 2.4.4, but that it stops being a typedef for wchar_t on Linux. C++ code that uses that assumption might stop compiling. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4