skip at pobox.com wrote: > Jeremy> Looks good to me. Why don't you check it in. > > I did, but it broke the C build, so I reverted it and reopened the patch. > I'll try to take a look at it more later today. I took a different approach, introducing a second kind of sequence. Since most accesses go through macros, they are already typed correctly as long as the field have the same names (templates in C :-). Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4