Someone on IRC (who refuses to report bugs on sourceforge, so I guess he wants to remain anonymous) came with this very amusing bug: int(), when raising ValueError, doesn't quote (or repr(), rather) its arguments: >>> int("") Traceback (most recent call last): File "<stdin>", line 1, in ? ValueError: invalid literal for int(): >>> int("34\n\n\n5") Traceback (most recent call last): File "<stdin>", line 1, in ? ValueError: invalid literal for int(): 34 5 >>> Unicode behaviour also isn't always consistent: >>> int(u'\u0100') Traceback (most recent call last): File "<stdin>", line 1, in ? UnicodeEncodeError: 'decimal' codec can't encode character u'\u0100' in position 0: invalid decimal Unicode string >>> int(u'\u09ec', 6) Traceback (most recent call last): File "<stdin>", line 1, in ? ValueError: invalid literal for int(): 6 And trying to use the 'decimal' codec directly: >>> u'6'.encode('decimal') Traceback (most recent call last): File "<stdin>", line 1, in ? LookupError: unknown encoding: decimal I'm not sure if the latter problems are fixable, but the former should be fixed by passing the argument to ValueError through repr(), I think. It's also been suggested (by the reporter, and I agree) that the actual base should be in the errormessage too. Is there some reason not to do this that I've overlooked? -- Thomas Wouters <thomas at python.org> Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20060409/9b123b2e/attachment.htm
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4