RetroSearch Browse

Thu Apr 6 19:47:44 CEST 2006 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-April/063492.html

I think it's fine as it is. I don't think making it walk the
inheritance tree is helpful; the output would be too large. Also, an
instance doesn't have any code and that's fine too.

(Didn't you mean "dis.dis(D) doesn't touch C"?)

--Guido

On 4/6/06, Georg Brandl <g.brandl at gmx.net> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> dis.dis currently handles new-style classes stepmotherly: given
>
> class C(object):
>   def Cm(): pass
>   class D(object):
>     def Dm(): pass
>
> dis.dis(C) doesn't touch D, and
> dis.dis(C()) doesn't touch anything.
>
> Should it be fixed? It may need some reworking in dis.dis.
>
> Georg
>
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org
>

--
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-April/063492.html below:

[Python-Dev] dis module and new-style classes