On Apr 5, 2006, at 8:30 PM, Greg Ewing wrote: > A while ago there was some discussion about including > elementtree in the std lib. I can't remember what the > conclusion about that was, but if it does go ahead, > I'd like to suggest that it be reorganised a bit. > > I've just started playing with it, and having a > package called elementtree containing a module > called ElementTree containing a class called > ElementTree is just too confusing for words! Try the 2.5 alpha 1 just released, and you'll see that the toplevel package is now xml.etree. The module and class are still called ElementTree, though. Alex
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4