A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-April/063463.html below:

[Python-Dev] 2.5a1 Performance

[Python-Dev] 2.5a1 Performance [Python-Dev] 2.5a1 PerformanceNeal Norwitz nnorwitz at gmail.com
Wed Apr 5 22:05:24 CEST 2006
On 4/5/06, Benji York <benji at benjiyork.com> wrote:
> Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> > What operating system and compiler?
>
> Oops, should have included that:
>      Ubuntu Breezy, Kernel 2.6.12-10-686
>      GCC 4.0.2 20050808 (prerelease) (Ubuntu 4.0.1-4ubuntu9)

32-bit or 64-bit?  I would expect a modest diff on 64-bit between 2.4 and 2.5.

You built both HEAD and 2.4 from scratch, right?

To get more consistent results, you need to pass an option to gcc to
tell it to use consistent branch prediction (or something like that). 
Otherwise, you will not get consistent results with the same source
code.  This option is not in the build system, you'll need to research
it.  I don't expect that to make more than a couple tenths of a
percent diff though.

I haven't done any profiling and I'm not likely to before 2.5 is
released.  It would be good if someone took a look at this though.

n
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4