Done. What exactly do you plan to do apart from editing the docs to steer people away from file()? --Guido On 4/3/06, Aahz <aahz at pythoncraft.com> wrote: > On Sun, Apr 02, 2006, Neal Norwitz wrote: > > > > I updated the PEP to include owners. If this message is sent directly > > to you, you are an owner. > > > > http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0356/ > > > > Review the PEP and let me know what needs to be changed. If your pet > > project isn't already in the PEP, assume it has been deferred until > > 2.6. > > Per "file() vs open(), round 7" at > http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-December/thread.html#59073 > please add to list of planned features and list me as the owner. I'd > calle this feature "make open() a factory function instead of an alias > for file() (with suitable doc changes)" -- that parenthetical being the > blocking factor here.... ;-) > -- > Aahz (aahz at pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/ > > "Look, it's your affair if you want to play with five people, but don't > go calling it doubles." --John Cleese anticipates Usenet > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org > -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4