Ok, I uploaded it. Patch no. 1462796: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1462796&group_id=5470&atid=305470 On 4/1/06, Aahz <aahz at pythoncraft.com> wrote: > On Sat, Apr 01, 2006, Noam Raphael wrote: > > > > I've found out that the hash value of tuples isn't saved after it's > > calculated. With strings it's different: the hash value of a string is > > calculated only on the first call to hash(string), and saved in the > > structure for future use. Saving the value makes dict lookup of tuples > > an operation with an amortized cost of O(1). > > [...] > > I will be happy to send a patch, if someone shows interest. > > Regardless of whether anyone shows interest, please submit a patch! Then > post the URL back here. That way if someone gets interested in the > future, your code is still available. > -- > Aahz (aahz at pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/ > > "Look, it's your affair if you want to play with five people, but don't > go calling it doubles." --John Cleese anticipates Usenet >
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4